Tag

Ref[In] Score

Every CitationLab post tagged Ref[In] Score. This topic runs through several posts across the blog — case files where it caused a real problem, and guides for handling it in your own reference list.

Guides

Audit your own paper's references before you submit it

A paper's reference list fails differently from a thesis: co-author merges, reference-manager exports, and a review cycle long enough for the literature to move. The five-step audit, in the order that pays.

Read the post →
For Institutions

REFerence [IN]tegrity for universities — the check that stopped running

Every thesis is screened for plagiarism. Nobody checks whether its references resolve. Why the check stopped, what AI did to the problem, and which units inside a university already own the work.

Read the post →
AI & Integrity

Ref[In] — naming the thing a citation check is actually for

Every tool describes an action: run a check. REFerence [IN]tegrity names the property a check is for — three claims about your document, and a ledger that has to balance.

Read the post →
For Institutions

The Ref[In] Index — measuring REFerence [IN]tegrity across universities

Every thesis is screened for plagiarism; almost none is checked for whether its references resolve. The Ref[In] Index measures it, one score per institution, published annually from August 2027.

Read the post →
For Institutions

What a Ref[In] Report tells a supervisor

A REFerence [IN]tegrity report reads a bibliography's health in one page: what the Ref[In] Score counts, what the missing and orphan tables mean, and how supervisors use it without turning quality into accusation.

Read the post →