Tag

Refin Methodology

Every CitationLab post tagged refin methodology. This topic runs through several posts across the blog — case files where it caused a real problem, and guides for handling it in your own reference list.

AI & Integrity

Ref[In] — naming the thing a citation check is actually for

Every tool describes an action: run a check. REFerence [IN]tegrity names the property a check is for — three claims about your document, and a ledger that has to balance.

Read the post →
For Institutions

The Ref[In] Index — measuring REFerence [IN]tegrity across universities

Every thesis is screened for plagiarism; almost none is checked for whether its references resolve. The Ref[In] Index measures it, one score per institution, published annually from August 2027.

Read the post →
Inside CitationLab

The seven steps of a Ref[In] annotation

Annotation runs as seven stages in a fixed order, on a frozen session, by one worker — and it will not begin until the ledger balances. What each stage produces, and why every constraint was added after something went wrong without it.

Read the post →
Inside CitationLab

We check the references you already had, not just the ones we found

A citation check that only reports what is missing leaves the risky part untouched. Every reference in your bibliography is independently resolved — including the DOI you supplied, which is followed to see what it actually describes.

Read the post →