Category

Case Files

Real checks on real theses, written up afterwards. Every case file starts from something that actually happened in a run — a style detected and then discarded, a surname that matched the wrong paper, a bibliography that balanced only because two entries were the same source. Names and titles are changed; the defect is not. These are the posts to read if you want to know what goes wrong in practice rather than in principle.

Case Files

'Nelson SD, W.' — anatomy of a mangled author

Vancouver author lists read under APA grammar produce names no human has. How 'Nelson SD, Wong PT' becomes 'Nelson SD, W.', why a wrong parse is worse than no parse, and when a checker should refuse to guess.

Read the post →
Case Files

From 1 thesis to 5,000: how we test

Every change we ship faces a jury of real theses — currently 105, being collated toward 1,000, headed for 5,000. The corpus method, the defects it surfaced, and the two times it caught our own mistakes.

Read the post →
Case Files

One author, two spellings, zero matches

A surname spelled two ways — a hyphen, a diacritic, a caps style — can make a citation checker report a missing reference and an orphan that are the same person. How name matching should actually work.

Read the post →
Case Files

One orphan, one missing: a healthy report

Zero defects is not what a healthy citation report looks like. Reading one realistic report — 213 pairs, one orphan reference, one missing citation — and the two-minute diagnosis for each row.

Read the post →
Case Files

The APA default that broke every Vancouver thesis

Most citation tools silently assume author–date referencing. Here is what that default does to a numbered Vancouver thesis — including the weeks our own system detected the style, then threw the answer away.

Read the post →
Case Files

The bare-year bug

A trailing '(2020)' after a shared-author citation is a real citation of a second paper — or a phantom, depending on how it's read. Anatomy of the bare-year defect class and the rule that resolves it.

Read the post →
Case Files

The checker said 90% of my citations failed. The checker was wrong.

A doctoral thesis was told 90% of its citations were missing. The real defect was one broken assumption — and the true error count was two. How to read a failure report before you panic.

Read the post →
Case Files

When a university becomes an author

A reference whose 'author' is a department: how affiliations leak into the author slot, why blanket rules break real corporate authors like WHO, and how registry evidence repairs the entry — with your approval.

Read the post →